Find Me on Facebook
Follow Me on Twitter
Add Me on LinkedIn
Mail Me
Read my Feeds

MBAs make their way in engineer-crazed tech world

This is the second story in an ongoing series profiling college graduates throughout the United States as they hunt for technology jobs. Check out CNET's special report, "Wanted: A job in tech," for a story tomorrow on a grad student who landed a job at Google, where he'll apply his operations chops to cloud computing.
Will you find MBAs here? The quirky, relaxed office environments of most tech companies (pictured here is Twitter's) are a far cry from where most business school students imagine they'll end up.
(Credit: CC: Enrique Dans/Flickr)
Julia Davis doesn't quite fit the profile of a typical candidate for a business school degree. After graduating from Lewis and Clark College in hipster mecca Portland, Ore., with a degree in psychology and an art minor, she worked at an art foundry in New York before ultimately finding her way to a consulting firm in San Francisco--and then to Skolkovo, a business school near Moscow in Russia. She finished the 16-month program in December, (most master of business administration, or MBA, programs are two academic years) and has spent the spring on the hunt for a job.
"I wanted to take my career in a more international direction," Davis told CNET. "I looked at the options and one of them was the Skolkovo program, which is co-sponsored by MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) in the U.S., so it has a brand name school associated with it. It was a new program, and it was focused on emerging markets, and the growth story in emerging markets was very compelling."
Julia Davis, who recently obtained her MBA in Russia and then began the job search for gigs at Silicon Valley start-ups, is shown here at conference in Moscow.
(Credit: Skolkovo)
There's another reason why Davis isn't your typical MBA: She's planning to head to a tech start-up when she graduates. When she spoke to CNET, she said she was in talks with an early-stage start-up in a strategy role. You'll find lots of diverse characters in the tech world, but people straight out of business school with no prior experience in the industry are rare among them.
"I'd always been passionate about technology," Davis said. "I lived in San Francisco, so I was sort of in the thick of it, and then when I moved to Russia I saw not only everything that was happening internationally with technology but also innovation and entrepreneurship, and I just realized that it was an exciting space to be in."
Valley outsiders
For decades, college students and young professionals have dreamed of attending business school for a chance to be the ultimate insiders, with all that suggests: the best network, the best corporate acumen, the best access to the best jobs on graduation. But with the technology industry booming once again in pockets of innovation like the San Francisco Bay Area and New York City, MBA candidates and recent graduates all too often find that they're the outsiders.
The Silicon Valley of 2011, flush with easy money and full of "hacker" energy, has an insatiable hunger for engineering talent, with colorful war stories emerging from the hiring process: bidding wars over young developers, exorbitantly high salaries just to keep a rival company from getting the goods. But young graduates who don't have technical expertise, even if they're armed with degrees from the most elite business schools in the country, have to fight a little harder to prove that employers want them.
"The engineers that I'm friends with are just like, 'Oh, my God, there's a waterfall of opportunity,'" Davis said. "They're inundated with offers. A lot of times when you hear about the war for talent that's happening in the Bay Area, it's definitely engineering-focused now."
"Entrepreneurship and venture capital are, like, two of the hardest things to break into" out of business school, said Christopher Muir, a Williams College graduate wrapping up his first year in the MBA program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "I know this just from trying to do it myself, and seeing friends."
Tech companies, from a behemoth like Google to a hyped start-up like Instagram, are in the business of making money, and they need financially savvy minds to avoid venture-fueled meltdowns like the ones that littered the landscape after the tech bubble burst in the early 2000s. So why can it be so tough for new MBAs to find their way in an industry that's hiring like mad?
One of the biggest problems is that the technology world is such a pack of insiders that, with the exception of companies like Google and Facebook that are in heavy hiring modes, most wouldn't think to look too far outside their existing networks to find new business talent.
"You have to build your own network. If you want to go from MBA into consulting, that's a fairly easy transition, whereas the MBA to technology, a lot of the tech companies--every tech company I speak with--they want to hire from inside their network," Davis said. "I usually have conversations with people because I've been introduced by a friend of a friend, or I know someone who works at that company."
The same has been true for Christopher Muir at Chapel Hill, who got lucky, at least for this summer. Earlier this year he was re-introduced to Jordan Cooper, one of his brother's college friends from Dartmouth, in a purely social context. Cooper is working on a start-up in New York called HyperPublic while he serves as a partner at Lerer Media Ventures, the investment firm co-founded by former AOL and Huffington Post exec Kenneth Lerer and his son Ben. Muir mentioned to Cooper that he was interviewing for a job with a large venture capital firm. Cooper told him he ought to work for a start-up instead, and so Muir scored a dual internship at HyperPublic and Lerer Ventures for the summer.
Different sense of timing
But Muir highlighted another problem: The hiring schedule that graduating MBAs are used to simply doesn't conform to the start-up world. A second-year MBA will anticipate interviewing for a job several months before graduating, or may expect to receive an offer from a company where he or she has interned before the second year of the MBA program has even begun. Start-ups don't hire like that. When they realize they need to fill a job, they fill it. Planning ahead often doesn't happen because a year-old company likely has no idea what'll be happening in six months.
"Internships, and especially full-time jobs can say, 'OK, we need help for three months this summer,'" said Christopher Muir, "but then you'll go back to school for your second year and at the end of the summer there's, like, a 5 percent chance that they'd say, 'We're going to need you in nine months when you graduate.'"
But the flip side of this is that the tech industry, in turn, might not realize that so many MBAs have caught the Silicon Valley fever. Business schools, particularly elite ones on the East Coast, are known for more or less shipping armies off to massive investment banks each year, rather than for producing talent with the creativity and flexibility a technology company needs.
"I consider myself a fairly unconventional business student because of the fact that I just don't like banking," said one soon-to-graduate MBA candidate at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business, who asked to remain anonymous because he was currently in the interview process with both Google and Facebook. "I'm totally OK with it, and perhaps there are some people who think that it's strange to pursue tech or something other than a guaranteed-highest-paying potential job out of business school, and I guess I don't really care what they think. I know that what I'm doing is fulfilling for me, and I suspect that what they're doing is probably not fulfilling for them."
Jeremy Frank, a second-year MBA student at New York University's Stern School of Business who has been working part-time at mobile start-up Foodspotting, said that if you don't attend one of the business schools known for producing candidates likely to head to technology companies--Stanford, MIT--you aren't likely to have recruiters seeking you out.
"If you want to go from MBA into consulting, that's a fairly easy transition, whereas the MBA to technology, a lot of the tech companies--every tech company I speak with--they want to hire from inside their network."
--Julia Davis, business school graduate on the tech job hunt
"I wouldn't say there's a massive presence of either large or small tech companies that are recruiting here, at least not in the MBA program," Frank said. "Google and Yahoo definitely have a presence, Apple not so much. Obviously, a lot of them are based in California and they do some of their recruiting on a geographic basis, but we also are not traditionally a tech-heavy school."
Frank's part-time job at Foodspotting came around through a connection from a friend from NYU, a former co-worker of Foodspotting exec Soraya Darabi when they were both employed at magazine publisher Conde Nast.
"They say that at business school you don't learn anything, that it's all about the network, and I guess the network came through for me," Frank said.
But he's trying to make it easier for fellow Stern graduates to find jobs at tech companies, particularly those in New York, by making the business school more visible in the vibrant local start-up community. "I'm an officer in the technology club here, and one of our biggest priorities as a club is to increase NYU's presence in the New York technology community, because traditionally we are a little more of a finance-oriented school, but that's changing a lot," Frank said. "The membership in the technology club over the past three years has grown dramatically."
Entrepreneurial spirit
Some business schools are going a step further and creating entire programs and initiatives designed for the cultivation of future entrepreneurs. Stern has an "entrepreneurship exchange" with NYU's broader Berkeley Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, which can provide stipends for students who want summer internships at start-ups but may be dissuaded by the fact that these jobs can't pay anywhere near as much as an internship at Goldman Sachs or Accenture.
Both student- and school-wide initiatives are making things brighter, according to Andrew Chang, another second-year Stern student, who, after graduation, is headed to a job at Kantar Video, an online video research and analytics company where he interned last summer. "A lot of my friends are going into technology, and I'm pretty excited," Chang told CNET.
Chang also mentioned another strategy MBAs can use to break into the tech industry: Found a start-up yourself. "There are a fair amount who have actually been incubating their own start-ups, and a couple of them even, instead of doing the traditional summer internship between their first and second years, spent time developing their own start-up projects, which I think is more and more prevalent."
In business school, no matter whether you're hoping to work in a skyscraper on Wall Street, somewhere on Google's brightly colored campus, or in an anonymous loft full of MacBooks and big dreams, you're going to need to know how to hustle. For the tech industry, it's a particularly deft hustle: not just going to class but also to local technology meetups, learning what start-ups and venture capital firms are getting talked about, and browsing Facebook to see which high school and college friends might be working at tech companies where they could make a few intros. The strategy required in navigating the tech job world as an MBA, one could say, is not at all unlike the creative effort necessary in the day-to-day work at one of those companies.
There are some who say that this period of frustration, as MBAs find themselves second-class hires in an engineering-crazed tech industry, will be a temporary one.
Davis, the MBA candidate who sought new opportunities by obtaining her degree in Russia rather than in the U.S., said she thinks the market for business school graduates in the tech industry is about to go up as the current crop of start-ups matures. "I think in six to nine months there will be a lot of additional support needed for the product that's being developed now," she said. "A lot of the feedback that I got was that they were really interested in my skills and expertise, but that they wanted someone like me in six to nine months. What I've been hearing in general is that many companies are focused on building up engineering talent and they're focused on building the product right now. My part of it, which is like, marketing growth, product management, isn't going to come for a few months."
But some young MBAs are hungrier to start sooner rather than later.
"There are so many exciting start-ups going on. People want to be part of something on the ground floor," Chang said. "Why go work at an established company when I could help create what the digital media of the future looks like?"
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Google Docs offline: Coming this summer

Google Apps logoSomewhat later than had been planned last year, Google is addressing a significant weaknesses of Google Docs and Google Apps: the inability to use the services while not connected to the Net.
"We will make them [Google Docs offline apps] available this summer," said Sundar Pichai, senior vice president of Chrome, in an interview here last week at at the Google I/O conference. "We've all been using it internally. It's imminent. We want to make sure they're good."
It's not clear just how high the demand for the feature is. Although I find offline Google Docs' absence a critical weakness, Google cited low interest in the idea as one justification for why it had removed an earlier attempt at the technology in 2008.
One thing is very different from three years ago, though: Chrome OS, which in June will move from prototype to product with Chromebook models from Acer and Samsung.
With Chrome OS, Google is betting that the world is ready for a browser-based operating system. For office workers using a Chrome OS machine to enter customer data into a Web form, offline access is no big deal, but for Chromebooks to reach their full potential, they have to be able to handle a bit more of what even the lowest-end PC can do. That includes being useful when you're on a subway, on an airplane, or heaven forbid, in some primitive backwater that's not saturated with reliable 3G.
Google reassures people that offline Web apps are now possible to program thanks to a number of interfaces such as AppCache and IndexedDB arriving in browsers. But actually taking advantage of those interfaces isn't necessarily easy.
Google Docs was supposed to get offline abilities in early 2011, for example.
Offline Docs hasn't been easy, in part because of years of shifts in the plumbing used to let browsers look for data on a local computer rather than a remote server on the other side of the Internet.
Initially, Google Docs had some incomplete offline support through a Google technology called Gears. Google removed that support when it discontinued Gears in favor of open Web standards that accomplished similar goals. The technology in Gears for offline storage was a SQL database interface that was closely related to the Web SQL Database standard for browsers. However, Mozilla and Microsoft didn't like its approach, and Web SQL's standardization was derailed.
A final challenge for Google might be its own vision. The company is betting heavily on a future in which the Internet is built into the fabric of our lives. Indeed, with lobbying and investments in networking technology, it's trying to hasten the arrival of that future.
Google has perhaps a better idea of what that future looks like. Its campuses are bathed in Wi-Fi and peppered with Ethernet ports. Employees have home broadband, Net-connected shuttle buses, and for those moments in between, wireless data modems.
Thus, it should come as no surprise that Pichai said he must consciously remember to unplug from the Net if he wants to try offline features of Google Docs.
But for those of us not in the Google bubble, with spotty 3G and capped data for our smartphone and home broadband, offline support is essential.
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Google's choice: Chrome OS or Android?

Sergey Brin, speaking to reporters at Google I/O.
Sergey Brin, speaking to reporters at Google I/O.
(Credit: Google)
SAN FRANCISCO--Google isn't the only big tech company with two operating systems. But it's the only one with two that take such a different approach.
Android and Chrome OS each got a day to themselves here at Google I/O a conference designed to fire up programmer interest in Google's technology.
With the new Android 3.1, an update to the tablet-centric Honeycomb version, Google yesterday added the ability for people to plug in keyboards, mice, game controllers, and many other USB and Bluetooth devices. In short, it's making the tablet more into a PC, architecturally speaking.
But today, the news was all about Chrome OS, a browser-based operating system that transforms new laptops from Samsung or Acer into vessels for Web applications.
Two days, two philosophies. In one, the device in front of you runs the applications natively, a method that would be old school except that new smartphones are powering an explosion of new programmer interest. The other is the ultimate expression of cloud computing, where a server at the other end of the network is running the show and you just have a powerful remote control.
Google, though, thinks there's room for both. There's no cage-match-to-the-death, two-will-enter-but-only-one-will-come-out-alive approach, Google co-founder Sergey Brin said while talking to reporters today after Google announced the first Chrome OS laptops.
"It's a great dilemma to find ourselves with two fantastic successes on our hands," Brin said, perhaps a little grandly given that the Chromebooks won't even ship until June 15 much less prove themselves a success. "We'd consider ourselves fortunate to have either Android or Chrome OS," he added, implying that instead it has an embarrassment of riches.
Acer Chromebook: Google's take on the Netbook
Acer Chromebook: Google's take on the Netbook
(Credit: Acer)
The company's biggest rivals also have two operating systems. Microsoft has Windows and now Windows Phone 7 for mobile devices. Apple has Mac OS X and iOS. Though there are some synergies here and there--perhaps more as ARM-based computers spread and as the mobile OSes grow up--those operating system projects are separate.
But they're still philosophically similar: a device with a processor, input hardware, and an output display is at the center of its own little universe. Google has a much more distributed view of the world.
Of course, even with Android, the cloud is important. It's intended to be a conduit to Gmail, Google Docs, and other Net-based services. Android is intended to accelerate the mobile-computing revolution, a job it's doing well (with Apple leading much of the charge), so part of its purpose is to link to a server.
With Chrome OS, the cloud isn't just important, it's almost all there is. You can use local files--view PDFs, play music, watch videos--but those features are more necessary evils than the heart of the experience. Google makes sure that when you plug a camera into the USB port, you can quickly transfer the photos to Picasa Web Albums.
Sundar Pichai, senior vice president of Chrome, argues that Android and Chrome OS provide "different, unique computing experiences."
"It's a very different model," Pichai said, pointing out that each reporter in the press Q&A had both a phone and a laptop. "We want to provide that choice to users and developers alike."
He has a point. Mobile phones don't have enough processing power to handle the highly abstracted mechanisms browsers provide for fancy graphics. And Web sites and Web apps often work poorly if at all on smartphones' small touch screens. So there's a big role for native apps are more.
But things are quite as simple as saying Google offers different tools for different circumstances. Android and Chrome OS are headed to similar hardware realms.
Take Google TV. With an Atom processor, a big screen, and a reliable home broadband connection, why not put Chrome OS on it? And what's the best OS for a tablet? If you're a hardware partner, which of Google's priorities should be yours?
Another complication: app stores. Do people who've bought an Android game in the Android market have to re-purchase it through the Chrome Web Store? Angry Birds is available in both, and it's safe to expect others to cross the divide.
Finally, there's the developer issue. Google must evangelize two separate, incompatible ecosystems. It has to produce development tools for each, too.
Overall, though, if any company can hold two such different ideas in its head at the same time, it's Google. The company loves programmers, and judging by how packed to the gills Google I/O is, a fair number of them love Google. And regardless of the fortunes of Chrome OS and Android, programmers will be writing for both types of operating systems.
That's because Web programming is a major force today, regardless of Chrome OS, and mobile apps are a major force today, regardless of Android. Both methods will thrive in coming years. Even if supporting both muddies the waters for Google's priorities and messaging, they're not mutually exclusive.
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Dynamic Google doodle draws dancers, complaints

A screenshot of the Ryan Woodward's Martha Graham dynamic doodle after it's finished drawing the Google logo.
A screenshot of Ryan Woodward's Martha Graham dynamic doodle after it's finished drawing the Google logo.
(Credit: screenshot by Stephen Shankland)
Today's Google doodle honors choreographer Martha Graham's birthday--and with animated dancers revealing it, the doodle also showcases the company's push to build a more dynamic Web.
The only problem: some people find it's slowing their machines. That's hardly the outcome that Google--obsessed over every millisecond of delay in delivering search results--could have wanted.
The dynamic doodle is a rarity for Google, but you can expect more as the company tries to draw attention to what can be done on the Web, not just to the subjects of its doodles. Indeed, Google had a whole session at its Google I/O conference this week to Google's Pac-Man doodle a year ago, which was an actual playable game.
Google tests such things, but still, not everybody is happy.
"The doodle is great," said commenter From the Pews in a Google forum posting spotted by Search Engine Roundtable. "Here's the problem. It's so great that it is actually interfering with the search engine. It is causing it to respond slowly to key strokes and of course to actual searches. You may want to adjust your doodle just a tad."
Cartoonist Ryan Woodward created the animated doodle, in which a dancer leaping across the page leaves Google's logo letters behind. Clicking the logo searches Google for the Martha Graham Dance Company. Graham was born today in 1894; the dance company was pleased about the doodle and congratulated itself on Facebook that "Martha Graham" is a hot trend on Twitter--a result that shows the power of Google's promotional abilities.
"Hope you guys like the Google Doodle I did in commemoration of legendary Martha Graham," Woodward said on his Web site. "This was released on May 11, 2011 on Google.com. I it was really great to work with dancers and choreographers from the Martha Graham Dance Company in New York on this. Martha was an incredible artist!"
Woodward, too, got some new fame out of the animation--but also some attendant troubles.
"The Google.com Doodle traffic just crashed both my websites and my host tells me I already have 'unlimited' bandwidth...? Sorry guys," Woodward tweeted early this morning.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Google puts its chips on developers

Stuffed Android at Google I/OA stuffed green Android sits on a shelf at Moscone West, welcoming developers to the Google I/O conference.
(Credit: James Martin)
SAN FRANCISCO - Search and advertising still pay the bills at Google, but as the company moves into new markets such as mobile and Web apps, increasingly its fortunes will be tied to developers outside the Googleplex.
At this week's Google I/O developer conference here the company will be reaching out to thousands of these third-party developers in an effort to enlist their help in creating robust ecosystems for up and coming Google products. How successfully Google is able to tap into this developer culture to fuel growth in Google products will determine Google's standing in the competitive landscape.
In mobile, this means that Google will have to get app developers to think of its Android smartphone and OS first rather than as an afterthought to developing apps for Apple's iOS platform. It also means creating an ecosystem that pushes a cloud-based computing architecture with Web apps at its core.
On each front Google faces challenges. Despite the fact that it now dominates sales of smartphones in the U.S. and around the world, Google's Android platform appears to be struggling to keep the attention of developers who worry about the platform's fragmentation issues. These developers also worry about their ability to make money from the apps they create for Android.
Meanwhile, when it comes to Web apps, Google faces the challenge of improving the Web's programming standards--in particular so that Chrome OS helps illustrate the power of Web apps rather than their shortcomings.
Android or bust
Google's Android mobile OS has had a meteoric rise over the past couple of years since the first Android smartphone was introduced in late 2008. The OS has quickly climbed from zero market share to owning close to 23 percent of the worldwide smartphone market, according to Gartner. And Android's march toward dominance is expected to continue. Gartner projects that Android could snag as much as 38.5 percent market share worldwide by the end of this year. And by the end of 2012, the Android OS may account for roughly 49 percent of all smartphones shipped throughout the world.
Meanwhile, Apple, Google's closest competitor, is expected to trail Android with about 19.4 percent market share worldwide at the end of 2011. And about 18.9 percent market share worldwide by the end of 2012, according to Gartner.
Despite this growth, smartphone app developers seem hesitant to fully embrace the Android platform. Instead of developing new mobile applications for Android smartphones and tablets first, developers are still looking to Apple's iOS platform initially. And yet, the number of apps for Android smartphones in particular is growing. Some experts predict that the number of smartphone apps in the Android Market may even surpass Apple's App Store this summer in terms of the total number of mobile smartphone apps it has available.
But despite the fact that the Android Market is catching up in volume doesn't necessarily mean that Android has become a top priority for developers.
"It's not just the quantity of apps, but it's the quality of those apps," said Scott Webster, who writes for CNET's Android Atlas blog. "And it's about whether developers are thinking of Android first when coming up with new capabilities."
While developers clearly recognize Android's long term importance in mobile, they see Apple as a more lucrative path initially.
In a recent survey of more than 2,700 app developers in April conducted by IDC and Appcelerator a software tool kit provider, app developers indicated that creating applications for Apple's iOS products took the highest priority for them. And Android followed as a second priority.
"Interest in Android has recently plateaued as concerns around fragmentation and disappointing results from early tablet sales have caused developers to pull back from their previous steadily increasing enthusiasm for Google's mobile operating system," Appcelerator said in a statement when the report was released.
Nearly two-thirds or about 63 percent of respondents said that device fragmentation in Android poses the biggest risk to the platform. This isn't surprising especially for smaller developers who have fewer resources to sink into their endeavors.
Paul Zimmer, founder of FlatPack, which developed a game for the Apple iPad, said that his company is holding off on developing apps for the Android platform. The No.1 priority for him and his small team right now is getting new games and apps out for the Apple iPhone and iPod Touch devices.
"The concern for us with Android is the fragmentation issue," he said. "With Apple we're guaranteed a discrete number of devices, screen sizes and device capabilities. But with Android the testing burden is so much higher because there are so many different variables."
Scott Kveton, CEO of Urban Airship, a company that offers developer tool kits for creating apps across platforms, agrees that the fragmentation issue is a deterrent for many developers.
"There's the fact that manufacturers are coming out with different devices with different screen sizes and different hardware capabilities," he said. "But there's also the fact that so many devices are running different versions of the Android OS. And the carriers and handset makers have much more say over which version runs on which devices."
Indeed, there are several Android handsets in the market that have still not gotten the Android 2.2 Froyo update let alone the latest 2.3 Gingerbread Android update.
Kveton said this is not the case with Apple, which controls the software platform updates and ensures that the same software release is made available for all compatible iOS devices at the same time.
Another major barrier for some developers is the fact that it's difficult to make money from Android apps. Zimmer admits that making money in any major mobile app market is getting harder, especially for smaller developers. The sheer number of apps in either the Apple App Store or the Google Android Market make it extremely hard for a small company to break out and to be discovered by users. But with Android it's even harder to make money because the Android user base is less likely to spend money on apps, he said. He said that even large app developers are making most of their money on the Android platform from advertising.
Even with these challenges, Urban Airship's Kveton notes that Android will likely overcome these barriers as the platform matures.
"Android lags Apple by about 18 months in many areas, including in-app purchasing and push notification," he said. "So in another year or so, I expect Android to catch up in terms of how developers view the platform. There will be so many devices out there, that no matter how much of a pain it might be, they'll have to develop for it."
Kveton predicts that the U.S. developer community may continue to focus on Apple for a while longer. But he believes that markets outside the U.S., such as Europe and Asia, where Android is growing rapidly, will likely view Android as the No. 1 platform to develop for within the next year or so.
"Google may not have to do anything and the developer community will gravitate toward Android in some markets," he said. "Just look at Microsoft. It didn't matter much if the Windows platform was a pain to develop for. They still were able to build an ecosystem because there was so much money to be made there. And with Android's installed base growing so rapidly, it offers the same thing."
Web Apps: The next frontier?
Android is only one facet of Google's developer interests, though. At the same time, the company also has long used Google I/O to tout the idea of Web-based applications.
Web apps serve Google's interests in different ways. Of course it's got its own--the online Google Apps suite that competes with Microsoft Office for $50 per user per year. Former CEO Eric Schmidt called Google Apps the company's next big billion-dollar revenue opportunity after search.
But search is the real cash cow at Google today, and the company's broad advocacy of Web apps probably is more closely aligned with search. The more time people spend online--and they will when compelling destinations such as Facebook lead them there--the more times they'll end up at Google's search box.
Web apps are maturing, but there's a huge amount of work to be done--standardization, browser support, developer training. There's healthy development, but today it takes Herculean effort to build something as complex as Google Apps.
The good thing about Web apps is they're inherently cross-platform--to an extent. Those with older browsers, with sluggish JavaScript performance and no support for new Web standards, can't take advantage of those features. That's why there's Google Chrome--the browser with which Google is working to catalyze faster change in the Web market.
It's not clear exactly how the arrival of Chrome sat at Microsoft, but it certainly didn't lower the priority of producing IE9, which has put Microsoft back in the browser game. Over the next years, with the gradual spread of Windows 7 and its successors, expect IE9 to spread as a mainstream browser.
Google has an interesting reason to build Chrome: to further its other businesses. Google can--indeed, it does--use Chrome as a mechanism to launch new technologies to the Web-app world. Among them are SPDY for faster server-to-browser communication, Native Client for faster execution of Web-based programs using a computing device's built-in hardware, notifications to alert Gmail chat users to new messages.
Getting Web developers and rival browser makers to adopt such technologies isn't easy, but it's easier when Google has a browser it can use hammer out the technology and to show the benefits. And it also gives the company a real seat at the table during Web-standards discussions.
Web programming is a fixture of the programming world, competition with native apps notwithstanding. A less certain future awaits Google's Web-only operating system, Chrome OS.
This software benefits from the vast amount of Web programming under way, giving it a big head start over operating systems that must start from scratch. But Chrome OS also is a gamble that people will find a use for devices that can handle Web apps and nothing else.
Chrome OS strives to reach beyond limitations of present browsers with features such as offline storage for working when there's no network connection and Native Client for better performance.
The trouble with those options, though, is that developers must be recruited to support them, and it's not clear whether they will unless Google can convince other browser makers to add support. The top two browser makers, Microsoft and Mozilla, have shown little enthusiasm for Native Client, for example.
Google is a patient company, though. And meanwhile, there's Android.
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Mozilla fights DHS over anti-MPAA, RIAA utility

No judge has ever declared a Firefox plug-in called MafiaaFire Redirector to be illegal. But that didn't stop the U.S. Department of Homeland Security from trying to censor it from the Web.
The Mozilla Foundation says DHS requested the removal of MafiaaFire, which describes itself as a utility that "automatically redirects you to the correct alternate site" if the main domain has been seized by the U.S. government.
Harvey Anderson, Mozilla's general counsel, told CNET today that the request from DHS was made over the phone. Anderson replied in writing, posing a list of questions in an April 19 e-mail, includin
g this important one: "Is Mozilla legally obligated to disable the add-on?"
Anderson says DHS hasn't replied, and the plug-in has not been removed.
A DHS spokesman told CNET this afternoon that "ICE's Homeland Security Investigations does not comment publicly on our interaction with Internet intermediaries on intellectual property theft enforcement issues." ICE stands for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement division.
The reason DHS doesn't like the MafiaaFire plugin is obvious: It makes the government's tactic of seizing domain names less useful. FirstRow.net, Atdhe.net, and Torrent-Finder.com are among the domains seized on grounds that they're allegedly infringing copyrights of U.S. companies.
One response to a domain name seizure is, simply, to move to a new one, preferably in a top-level domain that can't be easily reached by DHS and the U.S. judicial system. That's what the popular sports video-streaming Web site, Atdhe.net, did after its domain went offline. It's now at Atdhenet.tv (and, just in case, Atdhe.me as well).
MafiaaFire helps to make this process a little easier by redirecting Firefox automatically to the replacement Web site. Its unflattering name arose out of a protest against the RIAA and MPAA--aka "the Music and Film Industry Association of America"--and the "mad-with-power ICE."
If a government official applies pressure on a private company to delete a file or document, that can raise constitutional and free speech issues. In the 1963 case known as Bantam Books v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a commission's extra-judicial notification that some books or magazines were objectionable was an illegal "system of informal censorship."
"Whether the add-on is unlawful, or whether any speech is unlawful, is for the courts to determine, not for DHS to determine," says Aden Fine, staff attorney with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. "Nobody from DHS should be going around trying to get speech removed from the Internet before a court decides."
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Assange: Facebook is an 'appalling spy machine'

Julian AssangeWikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says Facebook, Google, and Yahoo are actually tools for the U.S. intelligence community.
Speaking to Russian news site RT in an interview published yesterday, Assange was especially critical of the world's top social network. He reportedly said that the information Facebook houses is a potential boon for the U.S. government if it tries to build up a dossier on users.
"Facebook in particular is the most appalling spying machine that has ever been invented," Assange said in the interview, which was videotaped and published on the site. "Here we have the world's most comprehensive database about people, their relationships, their names, their addresses, their locations and the communications with each other, their relatives, all sitting within the United States, all accessible to U.S. intelligence."
If that's the case, it might surprise some that WikiLeaks has its very own Facebook page. In fact, last year, when WikiLeaks released a controversial batch of confidential documents--putting Assange on the run--Facebook refused to shut down that page. The company said at the time that the page did not "violate our content standards nor have we encountered any material posted on the page that violates our policies."
Facebook's response stood in stark contrast to the treatment of WikiLeaks by many other companies in the U.S. last year. Several firms, including PayPal, blocked the company's accounts.
But Assange didn't just stop at Facebook. He also told RT that in addition to the world's largest social network, Google and Yahoo "have built-in interfaces for U.S. intelligence."
"It's not a matter of serving a subpoena," he told RT. "They have an interface that they have developed for U.S. intelligence to use."
Surprisingly, Assange didn't mention Twitter, another major social network with which his organization has run into trouble.
Earlier this year, the U.S. Justice Department sent a court order to Twitter, requesting the social network deliver information from accounts of activists that allegedly had ties to WikiLeaks. In March, the Justice Department was granted access to those accounts following a judge's ruling in favor of the seizure. Last month, the Justice Department said that complaints over its desire to obtain Twitter information is "absurd," and its actions are quite common in criminal investigations.
However, the Justice Department didn't secure a search warrant for access to the information. Instead, it obtained a 2703(d) order, allowing investigators to secure online records that are "relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation."
For U.S. intelligence, getting information from Facebook is much easier, Assange said in the interview. He reportedly told RT that the U.S. intelligence community's use of "legal and political pressure" on Facebook is enough for it get what it wants.
"Everyone should understand that when they add their friends to Facebook, they are doing free work for United States intelligence agencies in building this database for them," Assange said, according to the RT interview.
For its part, Facebook disagrees with Assange's sentiment. In a written statement to CNET, a Facebook spokesman said that it does only what's legal--and nothing more.
"We don't respond to pressure, we respond to compulsory legal process," the spokesman told CNET. "There has never been a time we have been pressured to turn over data [and] we fight every time we believe the legal process is insufficient. The legal standards for compelling a company to turn over data are determined by the laws of the country, and we respect that standard."
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Pakistan Twitter users capture raid on bin Laden

Sohaib Athar Even before U.S. special forces succeeded in their mission to capture or kill Osama bin Laden earlier today, Twitter users were recording a rough outline of the events to come.
Sohaib Athar, who describes himself as a 30-ish independent software consultant "taking a break from the rat-race by hiding in the mountains with his laptops," happened to be in Abbottabad, Pakistan, about 10 hours ago.
Athar heard the helicopters used during the raid. He shared updates live on Twitter, according to the microblogging service's timestamps. And he's likely to be a footnote in history as a result.
President Obama announced bin Laden's demise this evening, saying the elusive al-Qaeda leader was killed in a firefight and the identity of his body had been confirmed.
Here are some excerpts from the conversation that Athar and other Twitter users had over the last 10 hours:

https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64780730286358528
Helicopter hovering above Abbottabad at 1AM (is a rare event). about 10 hours ago via TweetDeck https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64783440226168832
A huge window shaking bang here in Abbottabad Cantt. I hope its not the start of something nasty :-S about 10 hours ago via TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64792407144796160
@m0hcin all silent after the blast, but a friend heard it 6 km away too... the helicopter is gone too. about 9 hours ago via TweetDeck in reply to m0hcin
https://twitter.com/m0hcin/status/64791032579108864
Just talked to family in Abbottabad, say they heard three blasts one after another, don't know what really happened. about 10 hours ago via web
https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64793269908930560
@m0hcin the few people online at this time of the night are saying one of the copters was not Pakistani... about 9 hours ago via TweetDeck in reply to m0hcin
https://twitter.com/m0hcin/status/64794837077065728
Seems something nasty happening in #Abbottabad, God save us. about 9 hours ago via web
https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64796769418088448
Since taliban (probably) don't have helicpoters, and since they're saying it was not "ours", so must be a complicated situation #abbottabad about 9 hours ago via TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64798882332278785
The abbottabad helicopter/UFO was shot down near the Bilal Town area, and there's report of a flash. People saying it could be a drone. about 9 hours ago via TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/tahirakram/status/64797447821602816
@ReallyVirtual Damn. Unusual. Was it of Pakistan Army? about 9 hours ago via TweetDeck in reply to ReallyVirtual
https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64800262354763776
@tahirakram very likely - but it was too noisy to be a spy craft, or, a very poor spy craft it was. about 9 hours ago via TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64892915167657984
@kursed Well, there were at least two copters last night, I heard one but a friend heard two, for 15-20 minutes. about 3 hours ago via TweetDeck in reply to kursed
https://twitter.com/naqvi/status/64883228590350336
i think the helicopter crash in Abbottabad, Pakistan and the President Obama breaking news address are connected. about 3 hours ago via web Retweeted by ReallyVirtual
https://twitter.com/ReallyVirtual/status/64892915167657984
Uh oh, now I'm the guy who liveblogged the Osama raid without knowing it. about 2 hours ago via TweetDeck
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Sohaib Athar on Twitter fame after bin Laden raid (Q&A)

As U.S. special forces assaulted Osama bin Laden's walled compound in Pakistan, a Twitter user was already recording a rough outline of the events to come.
Sohaib Athar, who describes himself as a 33-year-old programmer and consultant "taking a break from the rat race by hiding in the mountains with his laptops," happened to be staying up late at the time. And, from an account called Really Virtual, he live-blogged what he heard.
Sohaib Athar
Sohaib Athar
(Credit: Sohaib Athar)
Athar's real-time dispatches and self-effacing follow-ups have transformed him into an instant online celebrity. He's received at least one marriage proposal--through Twitter, of course--as well as requests for bin Laden-related "souvenirs," and he also appears to have become Pakistan's first Twitter user to surpass 100,000 followers.
CNET interviewed Athar this afternoon about his instant fame, the state of affairs in Abbottabad, and his plans for another tech start-up. Some other questions we didn't ask, about whether he knew bin Laden was living there (he didn't), are answered in a FAQ on his Web site. Below is a transcript, lightly edited for space. (See list of related CNET stories.)

Q: You said in your FAQ that nobody has contacted you from any governmental agency. Is that still the case?
Athar: Yes. No contact from the army, intelligence (ISI), police, government, etc. Unless it was undercover.
How many requests for interviews have you had so far? just dozens, or hundreds?
Athar: I haven't really counted them yet, but there are still 120-plus unread requests in my mailbox at the moment from today alone. I have been following CNET for a few years now--Download.com has been helpful too, so prioritized you.
Thanks! The folks at Download.com sit about 10 meters down the hall from me, so I'll pass along your kind words to them...What have been the worst distortions in the media? That Abbottabad is a close-in suburb of Islamabad? There must be something more interesting than that that I've missed...
Athar: Yeah, that was only the initial distortion. There are many small things that are being reported either incorrectly or incompletely--if I only talk about my own experience and how it is being quoted, there are many inconsistencies. So I can only imagine what kind of facts are being reported regarding the actual incident itself.
The "fact" that you watched the operation go down next door rather than heard it from a few kilometers away?
Athar: Yeah, there's that one--I am actually 2.5 kilometers away.
Have journalists descended on Abbottabad en masse? Political tourists?
Athar: The town is already a tourist hub in the summers, so the people are very used to lots of foreigners coming and going in this season. This time, they'll just get more journalists than mountain climbers.
Any bin Laden T-shirts yet?
Athar: Not in Abbottabad yet, nobody has cashed in on it...Hmm...thanks for the idea!
Should the photo, and perhaps the video, of bin Laden's demise be released?
Athar: Yes, definitely. The world deserves to see it. An "Osama II: The Return of Osama"-type scenario will always be in the back of their minds otherwise.
Your bio says you're a programmer and software consultant and that you worked with Frontiers in Neuroscience. How did you get into programming and Web application development?
Athar: My first computer was an Atari XL 800...1991 or so. Both me and my younger brother--he is at Cambridge, doing his PhD in neuro-linguistic programming--were hooked. Web and application development is what I have been doing off and on. My primary domain for around 10 years was 3D graphics programming.
You're using some sort of Unix-type system now? or Windows?
Athar: Err... Right now I'm on Windows 7--because I needed Visual Studio. But it is a dual boot. I'm usually using Kubuntu.
Why live in Abbottabad instead of somewhere more urban?
Athar: I moved from the second most urban city of Pakistan (after Karachi), Lahore. There were many reasons for the move, but the weather alone is a sufficient reason to live here. Other reasons: less power failures (not true now), no doorbells, more focus, cleaner air, low traffic.
Do you have a generator or a UPS battery backup? (Or just lots of candles?)
Athar: I do have both here at the coffee shop. In fact, there is no electricity right now, so the UPS is what is keeping the DSL working.
Any plans to visit the U.S.? We'd be happy to host a dinner for you and your many fans (especially in U.S. intelligence).
Athar: Thanks, I can't really travel even to Lahore at the moment--too tied up with a lot of things, but the next time I'm there, I'll take you up on that offer (minus the U.S. intel part).
So I just went to your coffee shop's Facebook page. Why did you start it? As a side business? To be social? And, most importantly, do you offer free Wi-Fi?
Athar: Yes, yes, and yes. I had been working from home for three years, and the no-social-circle scenario here was getting a bit boring, I couldn't get good coffee and wanted to break the cycle. It was the only place offering free Wi-Fi until others started copying us last month. Others are still selling instant Nescafe though; Coffity uses gourmet arabica beans.
Are you the first person in Pakistan to pass 100,000 Twitter followers, as far as you know?
Athar: As far as I know, yes.
What do you think is going to happen to the ex-bin Laden compound now? And is it really a "compound" or just a collection of houses with a perimeter wall?
Athar: It is actually one house with a double-walled perimeter. I have a bunch of images that I have to upload tonight actually.
Straying into foreign policy for a moment, what are your views on the U.S. presence in Afghanistan, its Predator drone policies, and its cross-border excursions into Pakistan?
Athar: Since I moved to Abbottabad, I have tried to reduce the number of things that I should be concerned about and have tried to focus on things that I can actually change. I can't change the U.S. Afghan policy (or the AfPak policy as they are now preferring), so I spend more brain cycles thinking about how I can help my immediate environment. In Pakistan, the only information we get is X people killed by drone, out of which Y are assumed to be terrorists. That is not good enough for public approval of the U.S. policies here in Pakistan.
Us Pakistanis are kept in the dark by both Pakistan and the U.S. regarding the true picture, so most of us resort to agreeing to one conspiracy theory or another--which helps the terrorists' causes.
Have the WikiLeaks-leaked U.S. State Department cables changed anything?
Athar: Only a small percentage of the Pakistani population--mainly the Internet activists and the literati--actually read and try to understand the implications of the cables, I think. So as far as the general population is concerned, they only read translated and distorted versions of the cables.
There isn't much "actionable" information regarding Pakistan in the cables to change anything--besides the opinions of a very small segment.
One of my colleagues wanted me to ask you if there was any weirdness with radios, Wi-Fi, or mobile phones during the raid. Jamming, in other words.
Athar: The power was cut off during the raid--a friend living in the neighborhood verified that. Landlines were working at least in my area. They did jam the signals and landlines a while AFTER the operation (and probably during the search operations) in the (Pakistani) morning, as many people could not get through to their friends or family living near the compound.
Do you have any more details about your Web site being hacked, at least briefly, after your initial tweets?
Athar: Not really. I had some malware running on the site last week actually, but was too busy to look at it and remove it. After the site started getting traffic and the malware was reported, I asked my brother to remove it (as I was too busy myself). I think he did, as nobody has complained after that.
After this interview, are you going to continue answering questions on Twitter through tomorrow?
Athar: Yes. I haven't even started yet... I need to move the hosting from a $10 shared one to a better server first, and will resume answering after that.
You know you're getting marriage proposals, right?
Athar: Oh--I guess I have room for three more wives.
I'm not sure whether you're joking.
Athar: Half joking--I can only take one more.
Did you ever walk by the bin Laden house before the raid? Did it stand out?
Athar: I did not walk by that particular area. I had no reason to. Nobody I know lives in the neighborhood--I did pass by the main road many times though.
When did you begin to suspect what you heard was linked to a bin Laden raid? And what did you think?
Athar: Let me check back on my timeline.
Ah, right, it was when I woke up, got to my coffee shop, logged in, and went over the last few hours' tweets. I retweeted a tweet saying: "I think the helicopter crash in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and the President Obama breaking news address are connected."
And your initial thought when you drew that connection was?
Athar: I drew the connection but saved myself from some typing by clicking the Retweet button. Funny, I remember that part. I was actually quite proud of saving the keystrokes. I think I started to guess how this would change the world in general and Abbottabad in particular in the next few days.
Has the Western media coverage, at least what you've seen, been fair to Pakistan and the Pakistani people?
Athar: Regarding the event itself, there is still confusion regarding whether or not the Pakistani authorities assisted in this particular operation--which is the main point that has been bothering the Pakistani people. If this was done by approval of the Pakistani Army, and if the Pakistani sovereignty was not violated, then most of the average Pakistani people would probably be more relaxed. Had it been someone else besides Osama, they'd be just as agitated to hear of an unauthorized attack by a foreign force.
The Pakistani government still hasn't been clear about whether they agreed to the raid, either with permission in advance or permission just before. I've read contradictory reports.
Athar: There are multiple versions being reported online as far as I have read. Most say that the Pakistani Army are acknowledging they assisted in the operation, but the U.S. Army is claiming that they did it alone, without any help. I need to read up on today's news to get up to date with these reports before I try to interpolate the facts.
Are you hiring? Your fans want to know.
Athar: I am an independent consultant myself these days. But perhaps when I work on my next startup...
Which will be?
Athar: Selling OBL T-shirts? Seriously though, I came to Abbottabad to brainstorm and create something new.
I have been involved with a couple of biotech start-ups in the last 10 to 11 years, and was missing the days of innovation a bit. So after a few more months of staying away from software development, I know I will need to find an idea and start working on it.
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Twitter delivers news of bin Laden's death first

Once again, Twitter carried vital information to Americans ahead of traditional news outlets. 

Keith Urbahn, once chief of staff for former Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld, is credited with breaking the story about the death of Osama bin Laden.
(Credit: Twitter)
The news that American special forces had killed Osama bin Laden, perhaps the most wanted man in the world, first began to trickle out when the White House communications director posted on Twitter that President Obama planned to address the nation at 10:30 p.m. eastern time, The New York Times reported Sunday evening.
Twitter, Facebook, and other social networks were also where people went to speculate--much of it erroneous--about what the president would discuss during his address to the nation.
According to the Times, the first scoop didn't come from that paper, the Washington Post, ABC News or any other news organization. Keith Urbahn, once chief of staff for former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, was credited for the Twitter scoop when he posted this note: "So I'm told by a reputable person they have killed Osama Bin Laden. Hot damn."
Chalk another one up again for citizen journalism and micro blogging. Twitter already had loads of scoops to its credit, such as being home to some of the first reports and photographs of the heroic crash landing of a U.S. Airways commercial jet on New York's Hudson River. Nonprofessional journalists using Twitter were first to report about the fatal shooting at Fort Hood in November 2009.

But tonight's news was by far the weightiest story that Twitter has ever helped break.
Bin Laden led al-Qaeda, which is considered a terrorist organization by the United States and much of the Western world. He is accused of being the architect of the September 11, 2001, airplane hijackings and attacks on New York and Washington, D.C., which resulted in the immediate death of more than 3,000 Americans.
During his speech, President Obama told the country that a small group of American troops had staked out for months a compound in Pakistan where a tip led them to believe bin Laden was hiding. The president authorized a small team of U.S. forces to assault the compound where a firefight ensued. Bin Laden was killed and U.S. authorities are now in possession of his body.
Because the president's speech was delayed until after 11 p.m. ET, Urbahn's tweet was followed by reports from traditional news outlets that bin Laden was dead.
Though Twitter can often seem like a repository for false or misleading reports, each Twitter user should be seen as a separate news source. Some are more accurate than others and it's up to the reader to decide who is telling the truth.
When it comes to being first, Twitter is a site built for speed. While TV cameramen and newspaper journalists are rushing to get to the scene of a news event, Twitter has already compiled posts from witnesses or people directly involved.
One more Twitter highlight from Sunday evening, the site appeared to handle a flood of traffic without any of the annoying outages or technical hiccups that we've seen in the past during big news events.
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Microsoft-RIM caveat: Dim results in deals with rivals

Seeing Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer take the stage at Research in Motion's Blackberry World conference in Orlando today prompted some wags to wonder if Lucifer was donning a down coat.
A new partnership between once fierce rivals, which calls for Microsoft's Bing Search and Bing Maps to be built into the operating system of future RIM devices, would have seemed unfathomable just a few years ago.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer speaking at Mobile World Congress 2011, shortly after announcing a deal with Nokia.

But it's hardly an unusual strategy for Microsoft. For years, the software titan has competed fiercely against companies, only to embrace them when their fortunes sag. The list is long. Microsoft made peace with America Online, a one-time competitor in Internet access that also bought browser rival Netscape. It settled with RealNetworks, with which it once did battle in the emerging digital media business. It famously courted Yahoo, eventually striking a deal in which Yahoo replaced its own search engine on its own site with Microsoft's technology.
And just this year, Nokia agreed to use Microsoft's Windows Phone mobile operating system instead of its own Symbian software.
It's hard, though, to point to a deal that Microsoft signed with a former rival that's worked out well for both companies. These days, AOL's Internet access business is a thing for history books, and the company is working to remake itself as a Web content powerhouse. RealNetworks never became the digital media leader it once aspired to be. That's Apple's mantle these days. And Yahoo's chief executive, Carol Bartz, acknowledged during the company's quarterly earnings call last month that Microsoft's AdCenter technology, the system for buying and delivering online ads that Yahoo agreed to use as part of its deal between the two companies, hasn't generated the amount of revenue it expected.
And it's not clear how much the deals with one-time rivals have helped Microsoft, either. Redmond shelled out eye-popping sums--$750 million to AOL Time Warner, and $761 million to RealNetworks--to settle lawsuits. Did the partnerships launched with those settlements really change marketplace dynamics? AOL agreed to a seven-year royalty-free license of Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser, which has lost share over the years to Mozilla's Firefox and Google's Chrome. Real, in its deal, agreed to support Bing's predecessor, MSN Search, and to promote use of Windows Media on portable devices. Those are businesses dominated today by Google and Apple.
The Yahoo deal has helped increase Microsoft's share of the search business. According to Experian Hitwise, searches powered by Bing topped 30 percent in March. But as Business Insider's Henry Blodget points out, it's coming at a huge cost. Microsoft is shelling out far more for distribution deals, like the newly inked RIM partnership, than it is generating from that business. That's one reason why Microsoft's online services division is hemorrhaging cash, losing $726 million just in the most recent quarter.
RIM, meanwhile, has been losing share in the smartphone market in recent years to both Apple's iOS and Google's Android operating systems. There's no doubt the company hopes the new deal with Microsoft will help staunch those losses. And Microsoft would like nothing more than for Bing to emerge as the leader in mobile search. But the history of these deals doesn't offer either company a lot of hope.
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Installing SQL Server 2000 in Windows 7

Installing SQL Server 2000 in Windows 7 is pretty much the same as installing in any version of Windows. I provide the guide here just for clarity and to help newbie.
As you have seen in my previous post at Running SQL Server 2000 in Windows 7, I have successfully installed and run SQL Server 2000 in Windows 7 RTM.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
SQL Server 2000 Installation Guide.
Step 1 – You are likely to see Program Compatibility Assistant when you run the setup. Ignore it, just Run the program.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 2 – Welcome to the classic installation wizard.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 3 – Select where to install the server. Local / Remote ?
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
In some cases, you probably get the following error message after selecting LOCAL COMPUTER.
—————————
Error
—————————
A previous program installation created pending file operations on the installation machine. You must restart the computer before running setup.
—————————
OK
—————————
as shown in this screen.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
This is a known issue with SQL Server 2000 installation and Microsoft Support has the solution. It will tell you to modify registry setting. You can backup and delete PendingFileRenameOperations as mentioned. If you don’t feel safe, just rename to “xxPendingFileRenameOperations” or anything you like. It will do the trick.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 4 – Select Create new instance.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 5 – Select Server and Client Tools.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 6 – Use default instance name or rename it as you see fit. I would recommend you to rename the instance if you are going to install another version of SQL Server.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 7 – Select TYPICAL, MINIMUM, or CUSTOM. If you wish to change the installation folder, you can do it here.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 8 – use Local System account for highest security privilege level.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Step 9 – Select MIXED MODE (recommended). This enables SQL Server Authentication mode. Enter password for default sa login.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Wait..wait…wait…done.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
After installation is complete, you can apply SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 4 as well. Ignore the Program Compatibility Assistant again and run the update.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Wait till wizard appears.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Select your SQL Server 2000 instance name.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Upgrade it! and wait till it completes.
Sudarpo.Net - SQL Server 2000 Windows 7
Have fun with your SQL Server 2000.

Notes:
The only issue that I have right now is I can’t apply the latest security patch for SQL Server 2000 such as:
  • KB899761-v8.00.2040
  • KB948110-v8.00.2050
  • KB960082-v8.00.2055
  • KB948111-8.00.2273
  • KB960083-v8.00.2282
I keep getting Not enough storage error or just a dumb error “installation did not complete“. It’s really not recommended to run SQL Server 2000 in your production server without these updates.
Error 1:
—————————
Setup Error
—————————
Not enough storage is available to process this command.
—————————
OK
—————————
Error 2:
After applying compatibility mode to Windows XP SP2 or SP3.
—————————
KB899761(ENU) Setup Error
—————————
KB899761(ENU) installation did not complete.
—————————
OK
—————————
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

RIM, Microsoft ally in smartphone wars

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer took the stage Tuesday morning at Research In Motion's Blackberry World conference in Orlando, Fla. to announce a new partnership between the computing giant and RIM, several reports indicate.
Starting today, Microsoft's Bing search and maps applications will be integrated into BlackBerry phones at the operating system level, said Gartner analyst Michael Gartenberg via his Twitter feed from the event. The search and mapping technology will include location-based services. Microsoft demonstrated the new Bing application running on a BlackBerry Torch 9800.
NPD Group analyst Ross Rubin, who is also attending the show, tweeted that Ballmer mentioned his love for his own Windows Phone platform, but acknowledged that Microsoft has had a strong working relationship and partnership with RIM. Ballmer also said Microsoft plans to "invest uniquely" in BlackBerry services.
But Rubin noted during the demonstration, "Bing on BlackBerry tastes more like Windows Phone 7 than BlackBerry."
Although on the surface it seems to make little sense for Microsoft to work closely with RIM, which is a direct competitor in the smartphone market, it is an indication of how stiff the competition is. RIM, which has been a dominant maker of smartphones, is slipping. Microsoft, meanwhile, is retrenching with a new OS platform called Windows Phone 7.
In February, Microsoft entered into a significant partnership with Nokia, under which handset maker Nokia is adopting the Windows Phone operating system.
The companies face enormous competition from Google with its Android operating system and Apple with its iconic iPhone.
The smartphone category of cell phones is growing as overall handset sales are slipping. During the first quarter of 2011, NPD said that unit sales of smartphones went up 8 percent from the previous quarter, amid a 1 percent drop of total handset sales. This was the first quarter that majority of handsets sold were smartphones, making up 54 percent of total sales.
But it looks like RIM is missing out on the growth, as consumers flock to Google Android and Apple iPhone devices. In the first quarter of 2011, Google's Android OS phones made up half of the phones sold, according to NPD. Meanwhile, RIM's BlackBerry OS continued to slip, dropping to 14 percent of sales during the quarter. In the fourth quarter, RIM sold 19 percent of smartphones.
Apple ate into RIM's sales and to a smaller extent into Android sales, which dipped from 53 percent of sales in the fourth quarter to 50 percent in the first quarter of 2011. Apple's iOS jumped to 28 percent of sales during the quarter, fueled in large part by the iPhone coming to Verizon Wireless.
Microsoft, which announced new Windows Phone devices in the fall of last year, is still a relatively small player. But it's banking on its partnership with Nokia to eventually kick-start sales worldwide.
But what's troubling for RIM and Microsoft is that U.S. consumers don't seem to even have them on their radar. A recent report from research firm Nielsen found that 31 percent of consumers surveyed said they plan to buy an Android-based smartphone in the next year. And another 30 percent say they plan to buy an Apple iPhone. Only 11 percent said they expected to buy a BlackBerry. And only 7 percent said they're planning to buy a Microsoft Windows Phone 7 device.
At this week's BlackBerry World, RIM has taken the wraps off several new handsets and the BlackBerry 7 OS that the company hopes will help it compete with Google and Apple. But analysts have given the new devices and the strategy a lukewarm reception.
Stephen Patel, an analyst with the equities firm Gleacher & Co., said in a research note that "newly announced OS7 products appear mostly evolutionary in our view and we prefer to take a wait and see approach as RIMM faces several tough transition quarters ahead and significant execution risk."
Specifically, Patel said he was impressed with some aspects of the new BlackBerry Bold, such as the thin form factor, faster browsing speed, improved graphics performance, and universal search. But he said he sees the new features as narrowing the gap with competition rather than leapfrogging them.
As for Microsoft, it's clear that the company is looking to compete aggressively in the smartphone market. But it's unclear if these partnerships will be effective in helping the company get back into the smartphone game.
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS